Legal Opinion

Hollywood, Inc. v. Zinkil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 2, 1981No. 78-1425PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

403 So.2d 528 (1981)

HOLLYWOOD, INC., Appellant,

v.

William G. ZINKIL, Sr., As Tax Assessor of Broward County, Florida, and City of Hollywood, Appellees.

No. 78-1425.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 2, 1981.

Davis W. Duke, Jr., of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Ellis, Spencer, Butler & Kisslan, Hollywood, for appellant.

Ray H. Pearson, Larry S. Stewart and Bertha Claire Lee of Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Richman & Greer, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

HURLEY, Judge.

This appeal marks another milestone in the prolonged litigation to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Downing v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. Richardson v. HolmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  5. Hollywood, Inc. v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Crigger v. Florida Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Brevard County v. BlaskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Trepanier v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API