Legal Opinion

Weldon v. Fritzlen

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas

Decided April 2, 1904No. 1,009Published

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

POLLOCK, District Judge.

An action under the Code was brought in the district court of Clark county by W. H. Weldon against D. G. Fritzlen and Edna P. Fritzlen, his wife, to foreclose two mortgages given by the Fritzlens to plaintiff to- secure a promissory note in the sum of $3,750, one a real estate mortgage, the other a chattel mortgage. To this action the Boatmen’s Bank, a corporation of Missouri, was made party defendant because of the fact that said bank held two mortgages prior in point of time, the one a real estate and the other a chattel mortgage, on the identical property mortgaged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API