People v. Jean-Baptiste
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Finger, 95 NY2d 894, 895 [2000]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. ReavesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. DobbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CordesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.