Legal Opinion

Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 1995No. 95-1697PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is before the court on an emergency basis. The appellant, Hernando Williams, is under sentence of death imposed by the courts of the State of Illinois. That sentence is scheduled to be executed in the early morning hours of tomorrow, March 22, 1995. This appeal was filed in this court on March 21, 1995 at 9:35 p.m. C.S.T.

The essence of Mr. Williams’ appeal is that the district court committed error when it denied his motion for relief under Rule 60(b), a motion filed earlier this evening and denied shortly thereafter by the district court. Mr. Williams’ contention is that he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Janet K. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard A. Peters, III and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. HartiganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duncan Peder McKenzie Jr. v. Rick Day, Director, Department of Corrections and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. State v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ex Parte BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Bush v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Duncan Peder McKenzie Jr. v. Rick Day, Director, Department of Corrections and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API