Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Prosser v. Martin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1954PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The legality of a sentence may be tested in a habeas corpus proceeding. When an order in such a proceeding directs the sentencing court to resentence the relator, such court *712is under the necessity of resentencing him within a reasonable time. If it fails to do so, the District Attorney is under a duty to make an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order to compel the sentencing court to proceed with such resentencing and pronounce judgment (Matter of Hogan v. Bohan, 305 N. Y. 110). Here, we have been told, the term of imprisonment that might have been lawfully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hogan v. BohanNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stevens v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. People ex rel. Harty v. FayNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. People v. CioffiNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API