Snowden v. Davis
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We deny Snowden’s petition for writ of mandamus directed to his former private counsel to obtain a copy of a transcript of criminal proceedings, which may be in the attorney’s possession. If Snowden has not been furnished a complete copy, he may well be entitled to obtain it through other means; i.e., replevin filed in the circuit court. See Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Florida Rules of Professional Conduct 4-1.16(d). Our denial in this instance is without prejudice to Snowden to pursue other remedies. However, mandamus to this court is inappropriate because…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hatten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Puckett v. GentryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Dubose v. ShelnuttDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- DANNY J. LAROCCO v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Hinson v. McQueenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991