In Re the Welfare of W.W.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This appeal questions the sufficiency of evidence that W.W.M., a juvenile, committed an act of criminal sexual conduct in the second degree (sexual contact with one under 13 years of age where the actor is more than 36 months older than the victim). Minn.Stat. § 609.343, subd. 1(a) (Supp. 1985). In addition, appellant claims the trial court erred in permitting evidence of a videotaped interview of the six-year old complainant, who testified at the adjudication hearing. We affirm.
FACTS
W.W.M. (born September 13, 1968; age 17 on date of delinquent act), whose mother resides…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. AniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. HesseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.