Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Rapley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1977No. 10853PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:
This appeal requires a construction of § 213(b) of the District of Columbia Rental Accommodations Act of 1975, D.C. Code 1976 Supp., § 45-1653(b). Appellant (tenant) refuses to quit an apartment leased to her by appellee despite the fact that her lease has expired and she has received a notice to quit. There being no genuine issue as to any material fact, the trial court granted appellee’s (landlord) motion for summary judgment. Appellant argues that the trial court improperly construed § 45-1653(b) of the Code; and that, in any event, the landlord is estopped from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trans-Lux Radio City Corp. v. Service Parking Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Molyneaux v. Town House, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Streeter v. MiddlemasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Klein v. LongoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hall v. Henry J. Robb, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. Rental Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Habib v. ThurstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ljc Corporation v. John J. BoyleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Jones v. Brawner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chang v. Louis & Alexander, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.