Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Stuhlmiller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 21, 1895PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Blackhawk District Court. — Hoe. J. L. Husted, Judge. Action in equity to recover the amount due upon two promissory notes, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure their payment. Demurrers to the petition were sustained, and the plaintiff refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants for costs. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKobinson, J.

The facts admitted by the demurrer are substantially as follows: On the first of November, j 875, the plaintiff, being the owner of one-h!alf of a lot in the city of Waterloo, in this state, sold and conveyed it to the defendant John Stuhlmiller, and, as a part of the purchase price, the latter made to the former two notes, of five hundred dollars each, one of which was payable in one year, and the other in two years after its date, with interest at ten per cent penannum, *327payable annually. To secure the payment of the notes, Stuhlmilier and his wife executed to thie plaintiff a mortgage on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clinton County v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Griffith v. Milwaukee Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Denny v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. James v. DaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  5. Brown v. RockholdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Colonial & United States Mortgage Co. v. Northwest Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Malanaphy v. Fuller & Johnson Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Jennings v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  4. Carter v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. Kuhl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API