Legal Opinion

Fallin v. Roe

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1953No. 1304Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellees, Mr. and Mrs. Roe, were the owners of certain real estate in Prince George’s County, Maryland, and desiring to sell, engaged appellant Fallin, a real estate broker, to find a purchaser. Thereafter Fallin reported to them that he had a purchaser, one Ernest, who would pay $9,950, but later he reported that the sale to Ernest had fallen through. He then presented to them an offer of one J. M. Powers to buy for $7,700. They accepted this offer and shortly after consummation of sale .to Powers learned that Powers, who was in fact Fallin’s wife, had acted merely as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. McNeill v. Dobson-Bainbridge, Realty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pierce v. National Bank of Commerce in St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Abbott v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Urciolo v. SachsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API