Prodan v. Hemeyer
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Krupansky, Judge.
Defendant appeals from an order of the trial court granting judgment for plaintiff on plaintiff’s complaint in the amount of $27,475 and granting judgment for plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. The relevant facts follow:
Plaintiff and defendant met sometime in the 1970s while working at the same company. Plaintiff, originally from Yugoslavia, worked at the company as a machinist; defendant worked at the company as a computer programmer.
In 1980, plaintiff and defendant decided to start a machine shop business together. Therefore, each contributed something to begin the new…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Thomas v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Wing Leasing, Inc. v. M & B Aviation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Apicella v. Paf Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hubbard v. PapeOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meehan v. MardisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Chapman v. Pomainville (In Re Pomainville)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- In Re Keithley Instruments, Inc., Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Genesis Respiratory Services, Inc. v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Weidle Corp. v. Leist (In Re Leist)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.