Legal Opinion

Sutton v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 13, 2005No. 03-90CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This case is before the Court on Cross-Motions For Judgment Upon The Administrative Record, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and plaintiffs Opposition to Proceedings on Remand. Plaintiff, James G. Sutton, challenges the Army’s March 27, 2002 decision to involuntarily discharge him from active duty status. He requests reinstatement with back pay and allowances, correction of his military records, and removal of all references to the Army’s involuntary discharge action from his records. After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument, this Court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Bevevino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Exnicios v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API