In the Interest of B. R. F., a Child
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Justice.
This appeal comes to us from the grant of a petition for a writ of certiorari. In the underlying case, appellee Mother’s parental rights were terminated on January 14, 2013. Since Mother was indigent, she was represented by appointed counsel during the termination proceedings in the juvenile court per OCGA § 15-11-98 (2012). In a letter that was apparently written prior to the issuance of the final termination of rights order, 2 trial counsel told Mother that he could not represent her in an appeal, that she was not entitled to indigent defense for the discretionary appeal of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In the Interest of B. R. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- In the Interest of M. G. W. Et Al., ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Antonio Fair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020
- Avery L. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.