Legal Opinion

Davis v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 26, 1984No. A14-83-772CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a default judgment rendered after appellant failed to answer or participate in the trial court below. The decisive issues on appeal are whether the trial court was authorized to render a default judgment granting grandparent access to a grandchild under the then existing Family Code, and whether there was sufficient evidence to support an award of custody of a grandchild to its grandparents. We conclude that despite appellant’s failure to answer, both of the above actions were improper, and we accordingly reverse and remand the cause for further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Dosamantes v. DosamantesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Texas Industries, Inc. v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Thomas Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Rulon Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lakeside Leasing Corp. v. Kirkwood Atrium Office Park Phase 3Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Arnold v. Allen Center Co. 2Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Federal National Mortgage Association v. Summit Residential Services, LLC, as Trustee for the Hobby Falcon 2212 Land Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  4. Red Hot Enterprises LLC, A.K.A. Red Hot Signs Printing and Promotional, and Charles Patrick Jackson v. Yellow Book Sales and Distribution Company, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  5. Russell John Holmes v. Eiland Coffee at Canyon Creek, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API