Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hirni v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 18, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Host. James H. Lay, Judge. (1) The intent of the framers of the constitution should govern in interpreting its provisions. Cooley’s Const. Lim. [6 Ed.], 69. (2) 'In determining such intent it is proper to consult the status of public affairs at the time and the causes which led to its adoption.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Bates Circuit Court. — Host. James H. Lay, Judge. (1) The intent of the framers of the constitution should govern in interpreting its provisions. Cooley’s Const. Lim. [6 Ed.], 69. (2) 'In determining such intent it is proper to consult the status of public affairs at the time and the causes which led to its adoption. (3) The constitutional limitation prescribed in section 11 of article 10 applies to townships as fully as if in terms they had been designated therein. State, etc., v. Brassfield, 67 Mo.’331; see, also, State, etc., v. Columbia, 111 Mo. 365; Barnard v. Knox Co., 105…

1Opinion of the CourtBrace, J.

— This is an action by the collector of Bates county to recover unpaid taxes for the years 1889 and 1890 in which the plaintiff obtained judgment in the trial court and the defendant appeals. Bates county is under township organization. The assessed value of the property in that county on which taxes were levied for those years was over $6,000,000 and under $10,000,000. In addition to .a county tax of fifty cents on the $100 levied upon the property of the defendant in those years, there was levied an .additional tax of twenty cents on the $100 called a township tax. The former the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Opinion of Supreme Court Judges on Township Organization LawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. MacOn County v. HuidekoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co v. McCleaveIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harris v. William R. Compton Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Three Rivers Junior College District of Poplar Bluff v. StatlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Texas Midland Railroad v. H. L. Edwards & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Brenner v. School District of Kansas City, MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1970
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. KleinNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API