Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sierra Club v. Hawaii Tourism Authority

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2002No. 23080Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

MOON, C.J.,

in which LEVINSON, J., joins.

The plurality holds that Sierra Club lacks standing to challenge the failure of the Ha-wai'i Tourism Authority (HTA) to conduct an environmental assessment (EA), pursuant to chapter 343, otherwise known as the Hawai'i Environmental Policy Act (HEPA), prior to committing state funds to a contract for tourism marketing services. In my view, the court has misapplied the doctrine of standing by erroneously characterizing Sierra Club’s asserted injury as an injury to the environment. In actuality, the asserted injury in this case is the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API