Legal Opinion

Anthony v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1940No. 6 Div. 724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

A case pending on appeal by defendant to the circuit court from the recorder’s court is triable de novo. Section 1937, Code. When so, as long as it remains in the circuit court, the judgment of the recorder’s court is ineffective as such,- and as jeopardy it stands as though it had never been rendered. 15 Am.Jur. 53, section 378; 43 Corpus Juris 486, note 33. However, the circuit court may dismiss the appeal and thereby reinstate the judgment of the recorder’s court. Section 1938, Code, as amended by Act of September 14, 1935. General Acts 1935, page 1107. This effected a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clawans v. RivesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. LancasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Thompson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. O'Brien v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Whitaker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of MobileCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Small v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Yarbrough v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  5. Daniel v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API