Huntley v. Hursey
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before-J., Chesterfield, April, 1903. Proceeding in probate court to prove will in solemn form by Ex parte M. E. Jackson in re. will of Emily Huntley against Mary Allie Hursey et al. . From Circuit order, petitioner appeals. cite: 16 S. C., 45; 11 Stat., 47; 33 S. C., 447; 35 S. C., 421; 4 S. C., 44; 132 Mass., 356; 17 S. C., 33. The former cites: Code of 1902, 2493; 12 Rich.
Read the full summary
Before-J., Chesterfield, April, 1903. Proceeding in probate court to prove will in solemn form by Ex parte M. E. Jackson in re. will of Emily Huntley against Mary Allie Hursey et al. . From Circuit order, petitioner appeals. cite: 16 S. C., 45; 11 Stat., 47; 33 S. C., 447; 35 S. C., 421; 4 S. C., 44; 132 Mass., 356; 17 S. C., 33. The former cites: Code of 1902, 2493; 12 Rich. Eq., 203; 8 Rich., 90; 16 S. C., 45; 35 S. C., 417; 37 S. C., 348; 49 S. C., 159; 50 S. C., 95; 65 S. C., 558.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered l^
Mr. Ci-iiEE Justice Pope.
On the 23d day of January, 1903, upon the formal petition of M. F. Jackson, a proceeding was instituted for the probate in solemn form of the will of Emily Pluntley, deceased. M. F. Jackson was the acting executor of said will. A summons was issued from the court of probate for Chesterfield County, S. C., directed to Mary Allie Hursey and Isaac S. Huntlejq requiring them to answer the same. Subsequently, at the instance of the said Mary Allie Hursey, J. E. Hart and Josephine R. Hart were made parties to the proceeding. For…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex parte WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
- Gable v. RauchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Kaufman v. CaughmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- Ex parte ApelerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Ex parte BrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892