Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. White

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1999PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

Maxine Davidson White (Appellant) appeals from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas finding that she lacks standing to bring a Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (PCRA) petition on behalf of Gary Heidnik as his next friend. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Following the reasoning of the United States Supreme Court in Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149, 110 S.Ct. 1717, 109 L.Ed.2d 135 (1990), our state jurisprudence provides that a third party, such as Appellant, who seeks standing to bring a PCRA appeal on behalf of a defendant as his next friend must first make two…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. TharpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. BaumhammersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API