Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Christilles v. H.J. Wilson Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 1987No. BQ-242Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge

The deputy’s order on review made three essential determinations: (1) that claimant’s fall at work on June 27,1983, causing injury to her knee, was compensable; (2) that the injury claimant suffered to her right elbow, resulting from the fall at home on December 1, 1985, was not related to her earlier compensable injury, and (3) that the claim for temporary total disability (TTD), and/or temporary partial disability (TPD), and/or wage-loss (WL) benefits from August 27, 1985, and continuing, should be denied, on the ground that any disability involving the condition of claimant’s knee was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ESCAMBIA CTY. COUNCIL v. GoldsmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Johnnie's Produce Company v. Benedict & JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. ST., DEPT. OF PUB. HEALTH v. WilcoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Newhouse v. VOLUSIA COUNTY SCHOOL BD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Sosenko v. American Airmotive CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API