Legal Opinion

Conrad v. City of New Iberia

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 2003No. CA 03-0121PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

847 So.2d 784 (2003)

Karl D. CONRAD

v.

CITY OF NEW IBERIA.

No. CA 03-0121.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 4, 2003.

John Blackwell, Attorney at Law, New Iberia, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellee, Karl D. Conrad.

J. Scott Thomas, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant/Appellant, City of New Iberia.

Court composed of SYLVIA R. COOKS, OSWALD A. DECUIR, and MARC T. AMY, Judges.

DECUIR, Judge.

In this slip and fall case, the City of New Iberia appeals a judgment of the trial court finding it liable for damages sustained by Karl Conrad. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Pitre v. Louisiana Tech UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Boyle v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Paine v. Avoyelles Council on AgingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Lawrence Hagler Smith v. Roy O. Martin Lumber CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API