Legal Opinion

Shotkin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1945No. 30945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, J.(a) After the bill of exceptions had been filed in this court, the plaintiff in error made a motion to amend it by adding thereto, as parties defendant, the six superior court judges who passed the order of September 21, 1944. We know of no law which would authorize the grant of such a motion. These judges were not acting in their individual capacity, but were acting only in their official capacity on behalf of the State of Georgia; therefore this court has no authority to make them parties defendant in their individual capacity or otherwise. This motion is denied.(b) The State…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Jowers & Son v. Kirkpatrick Hardware Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. Smith v. CuylerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Carter v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Walker v. Ful-Kalb Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. LawsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Coleman v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. Posner v. KoplinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Shotkin v. PomeroyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  5. Zachos v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API