Legal Opinion

Webb v. State

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Petition for a new trial, brought to the Supreme Court for Chittenden County at its January Term, 1916, and then heard on the admission of the facts alleged. The opinion states the case. See State v. Webb, 89 Vt. 326.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is a petition for a new trial. The petitioner was convicted at the September Term, 1914, of Chitten*66den County court for permitting certain dogs of which he was the owner to run at large unattended in violation of law. After verdict the petitioner moved to set it aside as against the evidence, for that there was no evidence of permission; and further as being unreasonable and unjust on the whole evidence. The motion was overruled under exception, followed by judgment and sentence. The court noted petitioner’s exceptions on the docket, ordered stay of execution and admitted him to bail…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. Nelson v. MarshallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  3. Hotel Vermont Co. v. CosgriffSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. Starkweather v. LoomisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1855

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  2. Reynolds v. RomanoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  4. Walsh v. ColeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  5. State v. MaguireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API