Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bienvenu

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 26, 1945No. 37731Published

1DissentHamiter, Justice

Although the bills of information as originally filed made no mention of the specific statute under which defendant was being prosecuted, they did charge him merely with wilfully and unlawfully committing the crime of gambling with dice for money. Unquestionably this was not sufficient for a conviction of the crime of gambling as defined by our existing laws, and the informations would have been vulnerable to an attack by motions to quash. Instead of proceeding in that manner, however, defendant asked for bills of particulars. These were furnished by the assistant district attorney and they…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. State v. LemoineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API