Legal Opinion
Walters v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 14, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARMER, Justice.
This appeal is from the trial court’s judgment holding that Appellant was obligated to provide fire insurance coverage to Appellees under the terms of their policy as facts sufficient to establish the defense of arson were not proven.
Sherrie and Michael Walters, Appellees, were married on June 23,1989 when she was 18 and he was 20. On January 5,1990, their first child was bom. They purchased the residence which is the subject of the instant dispute in October 1989. At this time, they also purchased a homeowners insurance policy with Appellant, Tennessee Farmers Mutual…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Floyd Harris and Doretha Harris v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Edward S. McIntosh and Rosalie McIntosh v. The Eagle Fire Company of New York, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Rallo v. Northwestern National InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- Huff v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alexander v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Johnson v. AllstateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000