Small v. Small
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Doane, J. cited: Barton v. Thompson, 46 la., 30; Berckmans v. Berckmans, 17 N. J. Ecp, 453; Freeman v. Freeman, 31 Wis., 235; 37 Id., 38; 2 Bishop, Mar. & Div. [6th Ed.], 6, 642; 2 Greenleaf, Ev. [14th Ed.], sec. 51; Lady Kirkwall’s Case, 2 Hagg.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Doane, J. cited: Barton v. Thompson, 46 la., 30; Berckmans v. Berckmans, 17 N. J. Ecp, 453; Freeman v. Freeman, 31 Wis., 235; 37 Id., 38; 2 Bishop, Mar. & Div. [6th Ed.], 6, 642; 2 Greenleaf, Ev. [14th Ed.], sec. 51; Lady Kirkwall’s Case, 2 Hagg. Consistory [Eng.], 277; Boss v. Boss, 1 P. & D. [Eng.], 734; Thomas v. Thomas, 2 Swab. &Tr. [Eng.], 113,118; Gipps v. Gipps, 3 Id., 116; Hedden v. Hedden, 6 C. E. Green [N. J.], 61; Bogers v. Bogers, 122 Mass., 423; Pitts v. Pitts, 52 N. Y., 593; Dance v. Dance, 3 Eng. Eccl., 341;…
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The plaintiff brought an action for a divorce in the district court of Douglas county and on the trial of the cause a decree was rendered as follows:
“ That the said plaintiff and the said defendant were married on July 29, 1875; that the said plaintiff has since said marriage conducted herself towards the said defendant as a faithful, chaste, and obedient wife; that said defendant has since said marriage been guilty of adultery, and that *845the said plaintiff has not since the discovery of the same condoned said offense.
“ It is therefore considered and adjudged, first, that the said defendant be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nelson v. BevinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martin v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- McGechie v. McGechieNebraska Supreme Court · 1895