Legal Opinion
Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 28, 2009No. 62700-7-IPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Four families who purchased homes built by Quadrant Corporation sued Quadrant and its parent corporations, Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and Weyerhaeuser Corporation, for fraud, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, rescission, and a declaration of the unenforceability of the arbitration clause for uncon-scionability. The purchase and sale agreement (PSA) used in all four transactions contains a broad mandatory arbitration provision covering any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to breach of the PSA or any claimed defect. Quadrant appeals the order denying its motion to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- David Johnson v. Keybank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Gandee v. LDL Freedom Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- River House Development, Inc. v. Integrus ArchitectureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Townsend v. Quadrant Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.