Legal Opinion

Noeker v. Howry

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Grove, J., presiding. Bill by Joseph and Mary Noeker against H. Kirke Howry and others to foreclose a mortgage. Thomas A. E. Weadock, receiver of the First National Bank of East Saginaw, petitioned for a review of the decree of foreclosure, and from a denial of the petition he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

H. Kirke Howry made his mortgage to Joseph and Mary Noeker. It contained the usual tax clause. He afterwards deeded the premises to Brewer, who in turn made a mortgage to Goodwillie, trustee for the First National Bank of East Saginaw, the State Savings Bank of Detroit, and the Saginaw County Savings Bank, to secure several claims held by them. The mortgage to the Noekers was foreclosed, decree being filed March 35, 1898. Previous to'the foreclosure, the three banks had agreed among themselves that they would pay interest and taxes upon the land, and, if the first mortgage should be…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. BaylarianSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Mortgage & Contract Co. v. First Mortgage Bond Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Victoria Copper Mining Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Electric Park Amusement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Tisman v. TismanMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API