Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bruzzese

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 8, 1983Published

1DissentPollock, J.

Succinctly stated, the issue in this case is whether the use of an arrest warrant as a pretext to search someone’s home is reasonable under the New Jersey and United States Constitutions. See U.S. Const, amend. IV; N.J. Const, art. I, par. 7 (1947). The majority finds to be irrelevant the fact that the arrest warrant was used as a pretext. I respectfully disagree. The disagreement begins with a different perception of the facts.

I

At 10:30 a.m. on November 14, 1980, Joseph Bruzzese was asleep in his bedroom on the second floor of his home at 563 Westfield Avenue, Roselle Park. His aunt, Mrs.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API