Legal Opinion

Boston & Arizona Smelting & Reduction Co v. Lewis

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1889No. Civil No. 213PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. D. H. Pinney, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is a suit adverse to the application for a patent to a mineral claim, alleging that defendants, in their application for a patent to the Merry Christmas claim, had included a portion of the Knoxville claim. The pleadings attack the Knoxville location, alleging that it was not marked on the ground by monuments; also that, if ever properly located, it has been abandoned by failure to do annual assess*6ment work. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The evidence is very voluminous, and very conflicting. We find in the record much testimony incompetent, because hearsay, admitted…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Duncan v. MackArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. First Baptist Church v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Shannon Copper Co. v. PotterArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wineinger v. WineingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API