Boston & Arizona Smelting & Reduction Co v. Lewis
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. D. H. Pinney, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
This is a suit adverse to the application for a patent to a mineral claim, alleging that defendants, in their application for a patent to the Merry Christmas claim, had included a portion of the Knoxville claim. The pleadings attack the Knoxville location, alleging that it was not marked on the ground by monuments; also that, if ever properly located, it has been abandoned by failure to do annual assess*6ment work. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. The evidence is very voluminous, and very conflicting. We find in the record much testimony incompetent, because hearsay, admitted…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Duncan v. MackArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- First Baptist Church v. ConnorArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Shannon Copper Co. v. PotterArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Wineinger v. WineingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.