Adkins v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The Attorney General who represents the State in this appellate proceeding has moved to dismiss the petition because said petition and the briefs supporting it were not served on him, as is required in such cases.
The motion is well taken. The Attorney General is the counsel who represents the State in such a case. It has been the consistent holding of this Court that without service of the petition and briefs on the Attorney General within the time required, this Court is without jurisdiction to proceed and a dismissal of the petition must be ordered. Golden v. State, 267…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Golden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Gambrell v. BridgesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- M.B. v. R.P.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
- Board of Commissioners of the City of Montgomery v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Bozeman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Thorpe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.