Legal Opinion
Earle A. Partington v. Joseph M. Gedan Howard T. Chang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1990No. 87-2375Published
1Opinion of the Court
914 F.2d 1349
17 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1245
Earle A. PARTINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph M. GEDAN; Howard T. Chang, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-2375.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Sept. 19, 1990.
Order Directing Rehearing En Banc
Nov. 1, 1990.
Earle A. Partington, Honolulu, Hawaii, pro se.
Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before WALLACE, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
2Per curiam
1
This case was originally reported as Partington v. Gedan, 880 F.2d 116 (9th Cir.1989). The Supreme Court, in a summary…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rufus E. Cunningham v. County of Los Angeles, and Richard Eiden, Real-Party-In-Interest-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. United States of America v. Kenneth W. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Joan Sheehan, Formerly Known as Joan Wycoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.