Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Beardsley v. Harl

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 16, 1942No. 14,964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

This is an action in quo warranto brought with the consent of the district attorney of the Second Judicial District, by Beardsley, as relator, to oust defendant in error Harl from the office of state bank commissioner; for an adjudication that relator was entitled to hold said office, and for recovery of salary heretofore paid Harl. Harl’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained. Assigning that the district court erred in so deciding, the relator here seeks a reversal of the judgment of dismissal which followed his election to stand on the complaint. Previously both Harl and relator took the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Barton v. LondonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. State Civil Service Commission v. CummingsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. People Ex Rel. Wade v. DownenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Kepley v. People Ex Rel. EversonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. WhartonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Civil Service Commission v. HazlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  2. People Ex Rel. Metzger v. WatrousSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  3. People Ex Rel. Henderson v. RedfernAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Commission v. HazlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. People ex rel. Duncan v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API