Kates v. Bok
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Gustav Bok and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew-York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of March, 1910, continuing in part an in junction and resettling an order entered on the 10th day of February, 1910, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1910, denying the defendants’ motion for a reargument of a motion to continue…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Gustav Bok and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew-York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the 15th day of March, 1910, continuing in part an in junction and resettling an order entered on the 10th day of February, 1910, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 9th day of February, 1910, denying the defendants’ motion for a reargument of a motion to continue the injunction. Appeal by the plaintiff, Xorbert B. Kates, from so much of the order entered on the 15th day of March,…
1Dissent
Ingraham, P. J. (dissenting in part):
I concur with Mr. Justice Soott that the plaintiff was entitled to the injunction asked for, .but I disagree with him in reversing so much of the order as enjoins the defendants from soliciting business from those who were customers of the former firm for the-reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Von Bremen v. MacMonnies (138 App. Div. 329).
Order granting injunction reversed to extent stated in opinion and motion, denied; order denying motion to continue injunction reversed and .motion granted to extent stated in opinion, without costs. Appeal from…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Von Bremen v. MacMonniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910