Legal Opinion

Palumbo v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1942No. 28665PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

The record presents the question whether the pay of a state employee is subject to garnishment. Despite its breadth and wide application, the question is- in this court for the first time. The judgment creditor, plaintiff, joining as named defendants the Industrial Commission of the state of Ohio, the Treasurer of State, and the Auditor of State, seeks to reach money owing to the judgment debtor as salary due him from the Industrial Commission of Ohio, an agency of the state. Plaintiff admits that his action is against the state, and bases his right upon the 1912 amendment to Section 16 of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Allen v. CookTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Brooks v. RaynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Uricich v. KolesarOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  2. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Schenkolewski v. Cleveland Metroparks SystemOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Thacker v. Board of Trustees of Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Brownfield v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API