Scott v. Bourn
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pacific County.—Hon. Richard K. Boney, Judge pro tern.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, C. J.
The record in this case is in such shape that it has been with great difficulty that the real controversy between the parties could be determined, and we would probably be justified in affirming the judgment for the reason that it does not sufficiently appear from the record what particular errors on the part of the trial court are relied upon for reversal. But since, by the aid of the brief of appellant, we have been able to discover what we deem to be the questions which were material to a correct determination of the controversy between…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Gleason v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Davies v. Rose-Marshall Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Bellingham v. AbrahamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Dittmar v. FryeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Lamb-Davis Lumber Co. v. StowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919