Legal Opinion

Krebs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 1988No. 87-2080PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

In this case the appellant argues that resentencing is necessitated by the Florida Supreme Court case of Hansbrough v. State, 509 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1987). Hans-brough held that premeditation of robbery is an invalid basis for a departure from the sentencing guidelines. Nevertheless, there was a second basis for departure utilized by the trial court: commission of a crime in a “professional manner.” That basis for departure previously has been approved by this court. Brown v. State, 480 So.2d 225 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); see also, Dickey v. State, 458 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Hansbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Dickey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Felts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. CobosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State of Washington v. Ignacio CobosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API