Legal Opinion
State v. Torrance
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 21, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 N.J. Super. 445 (1956)
125 A.2d 403
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM R. TORRANCE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 5, 1956.
Decided September 21, 1956.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. William W. Wimmer argued the cause for the defendant-appellant-respondent.
Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent-appellant (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney-General of the State of New Jersey, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. WeleckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. BunkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. LefanteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. EllensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. M.L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Knotts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- State v. GodfreyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State v. BurgessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- State v. John P. Callaghan Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.