Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Continental Insurance

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 4, 1895Published

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover a loss under a policy of insurance against fire issued by the defendant. The policy was for the sum of $2,500, and covered certain merchandise contained in the buildings 797 and 799 Third avenue. The language of the policy required the assured to give the company immediate notice, in writing, of any loss in case of fire. A fire took place on the 15th day of December, 1893, which resulted in the total destruction of the buildings above referred to, and their contents, including the merchandise of the assured. ¡Notice of loss in writing, however, was not given to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quinlan v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. McNally v. Phœnix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Griffey v. New York Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Carpenter v. German American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Bumstead v. . the Dividend Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API