Legal Opinion
Paregol v. Smith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 1954No. 1426Published
1Opinion of the Court
103 A.2d 576 (1954)
PAREGOL
v.
SMITH.
No. 1426.
Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
Argued February 8, 1954.
Decided March 26, 1954.
Goldie S. Paregol, Washington, D. C., appellant, pro se.
Franklin A. Higgs, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant landlord sued appellee tenant for possession of the leased premises on the ground of nonpayment of rent. The complaint did not make claim for a money judgment for rent in arrears, but merely asked judgment for possession. Personal service on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Shipley v. MajorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Paregol v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Block v. GatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949