Legal Opinion

Guidry v. Todd

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1985No. 85-CA-123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Judge.

This court, ex proprio motu, issued a rule to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as premature.

The pertinent dates and facts are as follows:

1. May 9, 1984 — case tried and oral judgment and reasons announced by the trial court.

2. May 31, 1984 — Appeal order filed.

3. Sept. 9, 1984 — written judgment signed by the trial judge.

4. Feb. 20, 1985 — Record lodged in this court.

The appellant has urged in brief that there existed some disagreement between counsel in the preparation of the May 9, 1984, judgment. Out of an abundance of caution he prepared and filed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Crescent River Port Pilots Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ShiefLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Riggs v. D X P Enterprises IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. Riggs v. D X P Enterprises IncDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API