Legal Opinion

State v. Bordelon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 23, 1904No. 15,227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Edmund Denis Miller, Judge. Action by the state against O. F. Bordelon. Rule to show cause why judgment of forfeiture on bond furnished by Bordelon should not be set aside. Application denied, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

NICHOLLS, J.

On the 15th of March, 1904, O. F. Bordelon and A. F. Christman applied to the judge of the Fifteenth Judicial District court for the parish of Calcasieu for a rule upon Joseph Moore, district attorney for that district, to show cause why the judgment of forfeiture recited therein of the bond furnished by Bordelon, with Christ-man as his security should not be set aside and declared satisfied for the reasons set forth in said application.

The allegations upon which this relief was sought were as follows: That on the 16th of February, 1903, O. F. Bordelon, one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  2. State v. BordelonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SandozSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  3. State v. AdairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API