Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pullen v. Ziegler

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1992No. 91-CA-1137Published

1ConcurrencePlotkin, Judge

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an attorney’s privilege under LSA-R.S. 9:5001 on a judgment he obtained in favor of the plaintiff entitles him to recovery of all the amounts he advanced to or on behalf of the client in addition to his agreed-upon fee. An amendment to the statute, effective June 16, 1989, provides specifically that attorneys are entitled to a privilege on those amounts; however, prior to the amendment the pertinent caselaw denied attorneys a privilege on any amounts other than the agreed-upon fee, taxable court costs, and necessary and reasonable expenses related to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. Dusenbery v. AndrasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API