Legal Opinion

Moschella v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Moschella seeks damages from the city in this action of tort under Gr. L. c. 84, § 15, for injuries sustained on September 17,1960, because of a defect in a pub-*81lie way. The case was submitted on a written stipulation which meets the requirements of a case stated. See Hayes v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. 310 Mass. 81, 83; Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Serv. Co. 343 Mass. 547, 551-552. The judge made a finding for the city.

Moschella, who filed a bill of exceptions and an appeal (see Gr. L. e. 231, § 96), cannot pursue both methods of review. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co. 284…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Clark v. M. W. Leahy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Royal Paper Box Co. v. Munro & Church Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Carlson v. DowgielewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Cannon v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Coppola v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Paccia's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Flynn v. Perini Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API