Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Bartec Industries, Inc. v. United Pacific Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 31, 1994No. Nos. 91-15805, 91-15935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Opinion filed October 6, 1992, slip op. 12085 and appearing at 976 F.2d 1274 (9th Cir.1992) are amended as follows. At slip op. 12091, 976 F.2d 1276, delete the final two sentences from the third full paragraph under the “FACTS ” section and substitute the following in the paragraph:
“Both Simpson and Bartee then filed separately the necessary claim against Matson, which in turn paid Simpson $172,835.31 for costs associated with the damaged steel. Matson also agreed to pay $50,063 for the lost beams.”
*856At slip op. 12098, 976 F.2d 1279, under “C. Prejudgment Interest,” delete the last two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- United States v. Waldemar Ratzlaf, United States of America v. Loretta RatzlafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States ex rel. Bartec Industries, Inc. v. United Pacific Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marisco, Ltd. v. GL Engineering & Construction Pte. Ltd,et alDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- United States of America Ex Rel. Bartec Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United Pacific Company, Dba United Pacific Reliance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Kauai Builders, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. Simpson-Irvine, a Joint Venture Organized in the State of California Federal Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation, Third-Party Defendants-Cross-Appellees. Simpson-Irvine, a Joint Venture, Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Bartec Industries, Inc., Fourth-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994