Legal Opinion

(HC) Rubio v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 15, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00983Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CESAR GARFIO RUBIO, No. 2:23-cv-00983-CKD P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The filing fee for this action has been paid. 19 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all 20 petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. John Paul WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Thomas J. Flatley v. Great American Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API