Legal Opinion

United States v. Gustavo Osuna-Picos

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1971No. 26549PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of his conviction under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegally re-entering the United States after deportation. Our jurisdiction rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Both entries into the United States were made upon fraudulent claims of citizenship. Appellant’s defense at trial was based upon the fact that he is the child of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence. He now asserts that the deportation order was rendered invalid by 8 U.S.C. § 1251(f), thereby negating an essential element of the crime. The trial court, 319 F.Supp. 558, rejected this contention and upheld the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee Fook Chuey, Also Known as Huey Gock Yut and Jimmie Huey v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Osuna-PicosDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1970

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reid v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Ramon Gasca-KraftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Razmik Levon DekermenjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Josue Castro-Guerrero v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Bruce Clifford PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API