Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Secular

New York County Courts

Decided March 31, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*280OPINION OF THE COURT

Allan L. Winick, J.

Plaintiff claiming authority seeks an order confirming the order of attachment granted on June 21, 1985 and modified by supplemental order of attachment signed on June 25, 1985.

The claiming authority has established to the court’s satisfaction that there is a substantial probability that it will prevail on the issue of forfeiture. The defendants, it is alleged, operated a drug business out of an office paid for in cash each month. A secretary took orders for drugs over the telephone and quoted prices to prospective customers. The inventory of the office…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. District Attorney v. McAuliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuriansky v. Natural Mold Shoe Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hynes v. DallasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Morgenthau v. CliffordNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Dillon v. Hawthorne, New York County Courts1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API