Legal Opinion · Dissent
Westergard v. Des Moines Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 4, 1952No. 47988Published
1DissentMulroney, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.
I. We start with the proposition that applications for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence are not favored. In Eller v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 230 Iowa 1255, 1260, 300 N.W. 535, 538, Avhere Ave reversed the trial- court’s order granting a new trial on the ground of newly -discoArered evidence, we said:
“It is frequently said that courts do not favor the granting of a neAV trial because of newly discovered evidence. The rule is stated in 20 R. C. L. 289, 290, section 72, as follows;
“ ‘While newly discovered evidence, material to. the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eller v. Paul Revere Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Danner v. CooperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Shepherd v. BrentonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- Simons v. HarrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- First State Bank v. TobinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.