Legal Opinion

State v. Rottinghaus

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 2010No. WD 71910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES EDWARD WELSH, Judge.

Mark Rottinghaus appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his application for unconditional release under section 552.040, RSMo 2000. Rottinghaus asserts that the State failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect that makes him presently dangerous to himself and others, that he is presently unable to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law, and that, in the foreseeable future, he is likely to have a mental disease or defect and be unable to conform his conduct to the requirements of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. State v. TooleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. State v. D.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Grass v. ReitzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Grass v. ReitzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API